Intrepid ideas

Don't be left behind. Join the thousands who already read Intrepid Ideas. Enter your email today to get free blog updates.

Your email:

Intrepid ideas featured in...

Customer Think
Innovation Excellence
Alltop

Unique insights from SpruanceQuarterly

SpruanceQuarterly

The SpruanceQuarterly newsletter provides unique insights into leadership, strategy, product marketing and pricing topics. Join the thousands of others who look to this important Spruance Group publication for cutting edge ideas and provocative commentary, subscribe today--it's free!

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What's the best way to sell a pair of $800 shoes?

  
  
  
  

$800 shoes

Here’s a great story that comes from William Poundstone and the book Priceless.

Some years back, the Williams-Sonoma chain offered a fancy breadmaker in their stores for $279.  After mediocre sales, they then offered an even higher priced model which was priced at $429. What do you think happened?

According to Poundstone, “The $429 model was a flop. Unless you’re running a boarding school, who needs a bigger breadmaker? But sales of the $279 model nearly doubled. Clearly there were people charmed by the idea of a quality breadmaker from Williams-Sonoma. The only thing that stopped them from buying was the price. It seemed high at $279. Once the store added the $429 model, the $279 machine was no longer seen as such an extravagance. It could be rationalized as a useful product that did nearly everything the $429 model did, at a bargain price. Adding another price point, even though hardly anyone choose it, increased the price consumers were willing to pay for a breadmaker.”

In this case, it’s not certain that Williams-Sonoma purposely added the $429 model only to juice up sales of the $279 model. But since then, retailers have understood that they have the power to manipulate consumers by adding contrasting products to their offering. Again, according to Poundstone, “when consumers are uncertain, they shy away from the most expensive item offered or the least expensive: the highest quality or the lowest quality: the biggest or the smallest. Most favor something in the middle. Ergo, the best way to sell a lot of $800 shoes is to display some $1,200 shoes next to them.”

Here’s the takeaway: The next time you walk into your favorite high-end store, don’t just look at the most expensive (and in some cases, outrageously expensive) item and ask the question “who would ever consider buying that?” Instead, look at how reasonable it makes other items for sale in the store appear. Sometimes the best way to sell a pair of $800 shoes is to display a pair of $1,200 shoes next to them.

Comments

This literally happened to me on my recent trip to NYC. Wanting to buy my wife a special gift I prowled around Bergdorf Goodman's shoe department. An amazing pair of Christian Laboutin heels with a $810 price tag made me pause ... But only until I saw others at over a grand. I bought immediately. BTW my wife loves the shoes! So I've been doing this too with my proposal options ... Adding a fourth, very high priced option ... It's resulted in higher takeup of Option 3.
Posted @ Friday, April 23, 2010 4:11 PM by Andrew Hollo
Thanks Andrew. Behavioral economics is a powerful force that we need to utilize when appropriate. 
 
Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment.
Posted @ Friday, April 23, 2010 8:08 PM by Patrick Lefler
Great article Pat. Having options when making a purchase makes a sale more probable rather than the buyer facing a 'take it or leave it'situation.
Posted @ Friday, April 23, 2010 11:24 PM by Garry Beavis
Pat--what would your consulting advice be to a company that wanted to drive sales to a mid-price item by inserting a high-price "place-holder" item that they know won't sell?
Posted @ Monday, April 26, 2010 12:19 PM by Sally Wright
Sally, 
 
The advice I would give is make sure that the contrasts between the mid-price item and high-price 'place-holder' be real - not just in price but also in attributes. 
 
Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment.
Posted @ Monday, April 26, 2010 8:29 PM by Patrick Lefler
Garry, 
 
You're right...the problem with take-it-or-leave-it situations is that sometimes the buyer will choose the 'leave-it' option; resulting in a lost sale. 
 
Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment.
Posted @ Monday, April 26, 2010 8:32 PM by Patrick Lefler
 
Thank you for sharing your great article and I like it very much. Welcome to Canada Goose Parka.
Posted @ Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:22 PM by Canada Goose Parka
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

JBHCWXG7DY3H