Welcome

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Will the Court's decision increase firearm sales? Think again...

  
  
  
  

 Supreme Court Building

Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional right to bear arms overrides state and local laws. While the decision may strengthen Americans’ rights to carry firearms, it probably won’t result in an increase in firearms sales. In fact, I’d argue just the opposite.

In a Wall Street Journal article published today, author John Jannarone makes this same point that gun sales could actually decline because of yesterday’s Supreme Count ruling. Does Jannarone’s theory seem counterintuitive? Not really and here’s why...it all has to due with the power of scarcity.

We’ve already seen the power of scarcity influencing the firearms market for the past 18 months or so. Gun sales surged in late 2008 and all of 2009 due in large part to the fear that the Obama Administration would clamp down on firearms. When people perceive that items are (or will be) scarce, a greater value is placed on that item which clearly influences behavior. The Supreme Court ruling affirming an individual’s right to carry firearms should have the immediate effect of reducing the perception of scarcity that has existed since late 2008. And that should translate into reduced demand and weaker sales.

Here’s the takeaway: In an earlier post, we examined the paradoxical reason why Oldsmobile exceeded all U.S. sales projections in 2003 - General Motors, its manufacturer decided it was going to discontinue the line due to poor sales. In this case, yesterday’s Supreme Court decision -  which will probably make it easier for American’s to purchase firearms going forward - will have the opposite effect in reducing sales because of the power of scarcity.

Comments

Ok Patrick...to think of an MDCC guru comment...so what?
Posted @ Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:52 AM by Richard Citrin
Richard, 
 
The “so what” is this... 
 
The power of scarcity can drive human behavior in ways that may seem paradoxical. When GM canceled a tired brand (Oldsmobile) because of lagging sales, most marketing ‘experts’ predicted that sales would plummet even more on customer support and ‘lame duck product' concerns. Actual sales did the opposite - they hit the roof because of behavioral economics and the power of scarcity. 
 
If you were an investor, Monday’s ruling might make you bullish on firearms stocks because of less concern over the legality of private citizen gun ownership which should result in increased sales. I’d be willing to bet that the opposite occurs - gun sales will probably decline in the near term which should damper the financial performance of firearms manufacturers. Powerful information that could prevent you from making an investment mistake. 
 
Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment. 
 
Pat
Posted @ Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:52 PM by Patrick Lefler
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

JBHCWXG7DY3H