Intrepid ideas

Don't be left behind. Join the thousands who already read Intrepid Ideas. Enter your email today to get free blog updates.

Your email:

Intrepid ideas featured in...

Customer Think
Innovation Excellence
Alltop

Unique insights from SpruanceQuarterly

SpruanceQuarterly

The SpruanceQuarterly newsletter provides unique insights into leadership, strategy, product marketing and pricing topics. Join the thousands of others who look to this important Spruance Group publication for cutting edge ideas and provocative commentary, subscribe today--it's free!

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Polavision - Polaroid's disruptive innovation failure

  
  
  
  

Polavision

The Polaroid Corporation was founded in 1937 by Edwin Land. While its early products focused on everything from eyewear to gunsight filters, the company was most famous for its innovative instant film cameras that hit the market in 1948. During the next three decades, Polaroid became one of the most successful technology companies in the post-war era. Sales grew at an annual rate of 23%; profits grew at 17% and its market capitalization exceeded $1 billion.

The problem with Polaroid’s strategy (as with most technology-based companies) was that they began to regard their business as a series of technology challenges and not market challenges. They assumed that once their technological innovations were ready, the market would follow with the result of ever-increasing profits. And while the strategy worked for the better part of their existence, it all came it a screeching halt with one large technology bet that went sour.

Polavision was to be Polaroid’s biggest technological breakthrough - an instant movie system similar to Polaroid’s instant camera. Polavision included a camera, film, and a special movie viewer that was used to both develop the firm and subsequently view the movie. While the system used a new type of color additive process which allowed for instant developing, its shortcomings were significant - the movies only lasted 2 1/2 minutes; there was no sound; and the extremely slow firm speed required very bright lights when taking the movie. The project had been in the R&D pipeline for over a decade and was championed personally by Edwin Land. Others within Polaroid weren’t so confident with the outcome. Polaroid’s president Bill McCune was probably the most skeptical; he felt that Polaroid was making too big a technology bet on a new product that lacked any type of market research. After many delays, Polavision hit the market in 1977--the same time that video-based systems were being introduced by competitors.  

The results were stunning but expected. Polavision bombed in the marketplace. With its high cost and poor film quality, Polavision could not even compete in the market against existing Super 8 cameras and projectors, whose days were already becoming numbered due to the emergence of the new video-based systems hitting the market. Polaroid had to write-off all the R&D costs along with most of the manufactured product at an immense cost to the company.

Former Polaroid freelancer Paul Giambarba remarked about the new Polavision system:

"I tried using the product but it was obviously a turkey compared to anything I was using that Kodak offered [..] Instant movie film was an engineering achievement but it's precisely what separated Polaroid techies from Polaroid pragmatists. There just weren't enough customers out there on whom to work the magic."

The Polavision failure was the first straw in the eventual demise of the Polaroid Corporation. The same poor management that allowed Polavision to hit the market without proper market research later allowed Polaroid to completely misread the impact of digital imaging on their highly profitable instant film business.

On October 11, 2001, Polaroid filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Almost all the company’s assets (including the Polaroid name itself) were sold to a subsidiary of Bank One. A new company was formed which operated under the name “Polaroid Corporation”. Polaroid cameras were discontinued in 2007. A second bankruptcy was filed in 2008 and production of Polaroid instant-firm ceased in 2009.

Here’s the takeaway: Polaroid’s demise was caused by an almost non-existent market strategy and a mistaken belief that disruptive innovation success is the result of overcoming technology challenges and not business model challenges.

Comments

Would have to agree with take on Polavision that ran into video Camrera/Tape that was both better in quality and cost. 
 
However Polaroid learned from this and did an extensive markting analysis (> $7.0 Million) to McKinsey)on Helios (Medical Imaging) and still got it wrong. It was the FINAL STRAW.
Posted @ Friday, November 12, 2010 7:35 AM by Joseph DelPico
Thru a polarising lens darkly I saw it coming -- I was on the sunglass side -- in Europe.  
 
Similarly , Polaroid failed (refused)to understand the market was changing around us. In what was sometimes dismissed as the ' minor part of the business ' and treated, as such -- ( no feeding , only milking ) , no one dared to take on Management --  
 
True we did introduce some great frames but we needed lens options (' but how can we say Polaroid if the lens is not polarising ? ) plus Fashion name (s) Too late.
Posted @ Friday, November 12, 2010 9:47 AM by david mayhew
Air jordan retro is a great general, form-fitting sneaker lace, the building actually extends under the foot that gives the wearer feel very block around the entire foot, the Air Jordan 2011 ranks very high in the form, aesthetics and performance. That said, there is much to complain about. Michael Jordan's legacy is alive with the launch of the new jordan shoes every year and re-releasing retro Air Jordan. Air Jordan shoes are retro remake of the classic Air Jordan is in the colors Mike wore on, or slightly modified to match with current trends. Mark new jordan reported several "hybrid" Jordan shoes that make the individual components of various wholesale Jordans.
Posted @ Monday, October 10, 2011 8:28 PM by jordan retro
Cheap Gucci shoes inside the internet is accepted and their mutual sustainability, modern look. You can purchase the most effective rather Gucci shoes for every grownup and evil women. So even if you appetite to go to men's shoes, and even if you're ready to go to Gucci men's shoes, it is certainly an acceptable idea. New Gucci may be regarded as a genuine right Recognize By Celebrated apple of your shoes. Wholesale minimal worth Gucci Gucci shoes and sandals are common for their critically acclaimed Appears Ample design and deviant. The steering committee to look into the agreeableness of belonging towards the Gucci shoes and sandals most effective that women adopt them to leave alone. Even if you appetite to buy the most efficient rather devotion branded shoes, sandals, and you should also accept reasonable wholesale Gucci shoes, Gucci shoes and sandals.
Posted @ Monday, October 10, 2011 8:30 PM by New Gucci
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

JBHCWXG7DY3H